NewAssignment.Net

Join NewAssignment.Net’s Facebook Group.

WHERE WE ARE

BeatBlogging.Org

13 beat reporters build social networks into their beats.

OffTheBus.Net

Help us cover the presidential elections at OffTheBus.net

Broowaha.com

A citizen journalism network to experiment with distributed reporting.

Readable Laws

Explaining Congressional legislation in plain English.

Assignment Zero

Published in Wired News.


Want To Learn More About NAN?

Check out this 7-minute interview with Jay Rosen. Or watch the full presentation at the Berkman Center, also available in MP3, or this five part nicely edited
series
.


Browse archives

« July 2008  
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
    2 3 4 5
6 8 9 11 12
13 14 15 17 18 19
21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

The Now Infamous Virginia Tech Video

by Steve Fox on April 17, 2007 - 3:44pm.

Well, it didn’t take long. One of my students at the University of Maryland has a brother who attends Virginia Tech and lost two friends yesterday. She started to break down as she told me she would not be in class tonight.

As everyone steps up to applaud the “citizen journalism” that occurred yesterday, with kudos upon kudos give to the cellphone video made infamous by CNN, I can’t help but think what my student’s brother thought yesterday upon seeing that video played over and over and over again.

Consider this: the video had no inherent news value and told no story.

It did have sounds of bullets being fired and screams.

Those were bullets that killed, maimed and injured students and faculty members. This wasn’t a video game.

Is such video responsible journalism? Are these the types of Citizen Journalists that people want to see? Are we doomed to create “citizen journalists” to play the I-patsies for cable television?

There were other not-so-proud moments, including the decision to publish this and then the rush to judgment reported here.

As most professional journalists who have covered breaking news and tragedy know, the facts are never clear in the first couple of hours and will likely change. And, when reporting on tragedy, two things rise above most — try not to do harm and think of those involved — both victims and their families. It means slowing down. And, thinking, should I really whip out my cellphone here?

Cable television long ago threw out the baby with the bath water. Now, breaking news events are an opportunity for ratings as viewers watch tragedy unfold. Journalism? Hardly. Students who were in shock were interviewed regularly, with the final question of “how are you feeling” inevitably searching for a sob. Watching tragedy unfold via cable news is the soap opera of the modern era. It’s hardly journalism.

Which brings us back to our heralded cell-phone videographer yesterday. The London bombing showed us how anyone with a cell phone can capture images. But, that was after a news event had occurred. Our heralded citizen journalist captured sounds of people being killed, injured and maimed yesterday as it occurred.

Is this really the type of behavior to applaud, to train citizen journalists to take part in? More importantly, what’s the news here?

Finally, step back for a second. Play the video. And, imagine you have a son or daughter attending Virginia Tech, you can’t get ahold of them and you turn on CNN to find out some information and instead you come across that video.


Virgina Tech News Coverage

Dear Mr. Fox,

I’m actually discussing the graphic Virginia Tech news coverage for an upcoming presentation in my media law and ethics class. I was wondering if you had any insight you could offer. Please email me back if possible.

Erin


Virginia Tech

I remember watching the reports from Virginia Tech too. I have many friends who watch such video. I disagree with you. I think these kind of videos are very important.


The Columbia Journalism Review chimes in

The Columbia Journalism Review had some interesting arguments against CNN and the MSM for using the video. It states:

Arguably the most stunning thing about Albarghouti’s footage is not what he was filming — it took repeated viewings to figure out exactly what it was that he captured — but the fact that he seemed to run toward the gunshots. We applaud — scratch that — we expect any cameraman worth his salt to move toward the action, but a grad student with no experience in these situations? Not so much. It seems more like a recipe for disaster than a brave new moment in citizen reporting.

What’s going to happen the first time one of CNN’s unpaid i-Reporters, or anyone else with a cell-phone camera who puts himself or herself in danger for the chance to record a bit of breaking news, gets seriously injured, or worse, killed, doing something like what Albarghouti did? The title “citizen journalist” has a nice ring to it, but in situations like the Virginia Tech shootings, the last thing anyone needs is a bunch of amateurs running around with their cell phones trying to get in on the action.

One thing that will happen, we suspect, is that CNN and the rest of these wall-to-wall news holes who bottomless appetite for cheap filler has done so much to lower journalistic standards, will no longer get this content for free.

I concur with them and you, Steve. Citizen journalists should magnify a story by involving themselves in it, and they have a great potential of doing so.


Being bondbarded by 24 hour

Being bondbarded by 24 hour news it almost seems as though I have become a bit numb to horrific events from what happened at Virginia Tech to what is happening in the Middle East. Just today 120 people were killed in Irag by a suicide bomber.

I remember watching the reports from Virginia Tech all day Monday. It wasn’t until I heard and saw the video clip you mentioned that it really struck me and what that young man had experienced. And I realized as he was recording this, people were dying. I broke down in tears.

That video will stay with me for life. I kindly disagree with you. I think these kind of videos are very important.


The news value of live

Steve,
We’re going to see much, much more sharing of news events like this — and, as I blogged, we’re going to see it live. Yes, that means we will see part of the story and misinformation sometimes. But who are we, the journalists, to say that we can handle that but the people can’t? I’d say it’s our job, instead, to give context and to add the value of journalism: reporting and fact-checking.

And I believe that video certainly had news value. It gave us one man’s perspective of a news event. It also showed us the future of news reporting.


Questioning is Good

Steve: Thanks for this piece. The dehumanizing that takes place in a 24-hour news cycle might be an unstoppable force, but we still need to question it, especially as citizen journalism becomes more and more of a factor.


Virginia Tech

That's video

Same argument can be made for any breaking news video: bank robbery, car chase, tsunami, hurricane, tornado, dui arrest, drug bust.
People love the stuff - cops love the stuff.
The world has changed. You can lament the change or accept it, but it won’t change back.