Join NewAssignment.Net’s Facebook Group.
WHERE WE ARE
BeatBlogging.Org

13 beat reporters build social networks into their beats.
OffTheBus.Net

Help us cover the presidential elections at OffTheBus.net
Broowaha.com
![]()
A citizen journalism network to experiment with distributed reporting.
Readable Laws

Explaining Congressional legislation in plain English.
Assignment Zero

Published in Wired News.
Check out this 7-minute interview with Jay Rosen. Or watch the full presentation at the Berkman Center, also available in MP3, or this five part nicely edited
series.
Like many politicians of the time, Utah lawmaker Steve Urquhart began his political career by passing out donuts to children and offering hot air balloon rides. Anything to connect better with his constituents.
At the urging of Phil Windley, a computer science professor at Brigham Young University, he sought to make virtual connections and began a blog at SteveU.com. Urquhart took another step into digital democracy when he recently launched Politicopia — a simple social-text wiki for people to congregate and discuss issues and legislation.
At a time when user-generated content and other Web 2.0 trends are all the rage, Urquhart is harnessing the Internet “for its ability to cut out the middleman.” Or in more succinct terms; “Though the Internet has moved sellers and consumers closer together, its strides in politics haven’t yet been so grand. In politics, intermediaries — like special interest groups, bureaucrats, and the media — heavily filter information between people and their elected officials.”
The idea was in part inspired and advised by Doc Searls and Micah Sifry — pioneers of fusion between technology and politics.
To bolster his new effort at interaction and transparency, Urquhart posted his school voucher bill in its entirety on Politicopia before he distributed it to his colleagues in the Utah House. Soon the page expanded with pro and con sections with findings from states like Vermont and Wisconsin accompanied by a section for comments, as wel as links to news articles about the bill.
“For six years we’ve been chasing our tail on this bill, and today the bill passed in very large part because of Politicopia. When private dialogue was made public, the main area of criticism was publicly revealed to be fictitious,” Urquhart told WebProNews in an email.
A version of the school voucher bill narrowly passed in the House of Representatives this year (see how the Representatives voted.
The Opinion Journal chimed in reported that after the school voucher bill was posted online, “thousands of people logged on to www.politicopia.com and participated.”
To follow up on how this experiment went, and perhaps to spread the idea, Uruhart will also speak about Politicopia at the Personal Democracy Forum this May in New York .
Beyond the voucher page on the wiki, other pages exist for legislation about college tuition for illegal immigrants, payday lending, and other issues facing the state legislature.
In writing about the brief history of Politicopia, Urquhart boasts that “One week into the experiment, Politicopia is working. Citizens are participating and citizens are being heard. Legislators are talking to me about things they’ve read on Politicopia. Because of input I received, I have changed a position I’ve held for years. Already, citizens are using Politicopia to shape the debate.”
With such resources and backing, Politicopia has a shot at succeeding and inspiring politicians in other states to adopt similar efforts of eliminating the middleman between constituents and their representatives while contemporaneously bridging the gap between them.
——
Petersen works for a web development firm as a search engine optimizer (SEO) and writes for his blog at blog.
www.billhop.com is network of state legislative wikis that launched last fall with Texas (at www.tx.billhop.com)
Billhop has a common platform across states that allows users to network about similar bills and issues moving in across the country.
Communism is a TERRIBLE idea in theory.
I fail to see how using a wiki to involve normal citizens in the legislative process equates to communism. Don’t most communistic governments actively try to squelch dissenting voices? Isn’t a wiki a great forum to express and discuss a variety of ideas that don’t conform to majority opinion?
This is one of those moments when a joke that you know would be funny if you said it in person just doesn’t work online.
Ready for me to geek out on you: “Marge, I agree with you — in theory. In theory, communism works. In theory.” — Homer Simpson.
You have to imagine Homer Simpson saying it, pauses in the right place.
To me, this is yet another example of why we don’t need legislators. Don’t we elect them so that THEY can write/edit/read legislation WITHOUT our direct involvement? Either Mr. Urquhart is trying to cover his own a$$ with plausible deniability and lack of accountability for his own bill, or he isn’t needed.
Why not make the switch to direct democracy and save ourselves the FORTUNES we are paying these useless representatives?
It’s a great idea in theory. But so is Communism.
We live in a Republic. We elect legislators to represent us. This means they should have their finger on the pulse of their constituents. I can think of no better tool than a Wiki. Can you?
The one problem with it: This is a good way to get your finger on the pulse of people who use the net. But this just means we need to get a more diverse group of people online.
If it weren't for Urquhart nobody would have had a voice
I really love the dialectic here.
Either he’s incompetent or we don’t need him.
Heads I win, tails you lose. Do you work for Fox?